For physical AI labs, robotics fleets, and autonomous systems

Replayable data infrastructure
for autonomous machines.

The data backbone for humanoid labs, AV foundation models, drone fleets, and robotics teams. Store large multimodal runs once, then replay, query, update, and retrain from the same data layer - hardened on one of the hardest production data problems.

  1. System of record

    Every robot run, sensor event, and model action - stored in one replayable, correction-ready timeline.

  2. Any run, any state, any time

    Access real-time data, historical data, or a specific robot run through SQL, REST, or Arrow Flight.

  3. From any point in history

    Replay a failed robot run with corrected labels, updated calibration, or a new model. Same inputs, fresh outputs.

01 - The execution gap

Physical AI is here.
The legacy data stack is the bottleneck.

A production robotics or physical AI stack runs on five or six fragmented systems, none designed to compose. Sensor data lives in one place, logs in another, annotations in another, replay jobs somewhere else. Debugging is manual, replay is unreliable, and corrections do not propagate cleanly.

  • LLM Reasoning
  • Redis State
  • Vector DB Retrieval
  • Postgres Logs
  • Kafka Events
  • Orchestrator Flows
TLDR

The result: Teams spend more time stitching together data infrastructure than improving the models, robots, and fleet-learning loops built on top.

  1. No single source of truth

    Sensor data, logs, labels, calibration data, and replay state live across separate systems. No clean answer to what the robot observed, recorded, inferred, or changed afterwards.

  2. Debugging is manual

    When a run fails: was the sensor data wrong? Label stale? Calibration changed? Model behavior unexpected? The team reconstructs the run by hand.

  3. Replay is unreliable

    Cannot replay a failed run from a precise timestamp with corrected labels, updated calibration, or a new model.

  4. No native correction layer

    Sensor recalibrations, corrected annotations, and episode re-segmentation ripple downstream silently. Every team writes its own reconciliation logic.

  5. Fleet data fragments fast

    Every robot, run, site, and model version creates more history. Without a shared data backbone, fleet-learning loops turn into custom pipelines.

02 - How Continuum solves it

The data primitives
physical AI systems need.

Replay, correction, ordering, large-payload handling, and real-time + historical access - every team building production robotics and physical AI systems rebuilds these primitives by hand on top of fragmented data stacks. Continuum makes them part of the data layer.

  • Memory
  • Replay
  • Correction
  • Ordering
  • Large Payloads
  • Fusion
03 - How Continuum works

Data in.
Queryable history out.

Whether sources are MCAP recorders, rosbag2 workflows, sensor pipelines, robot fleet logs, Kafka streams, or SDK calls, Continuum converts server-side to Apache Arrow and stores as columnar Parquet on S3. The same data feeds inference, retraining, analytics, and replay - through the interfaces each team already uses.

Any protocol in
  • Kafka
  • AMQP / RabbitMQ
  • Amazon SQS
  • REST / SDK
  • Arrow Flight
Any schema

MCAP recorders · rosbag2 workflows · Sensor pipelines · Robot fleet logs · Kafka streams · SDK calls

Continuum
Server-side conversion
Stored as
Parquet + ZSTDS3-native · Columnar compression
Data primitives
Replay · Correction · OrderingFor robotics and physical AI
Any protocol out
  • Inference loops
  • Retraining
  • Iceberg / SQL
  • Replay engine
  • Foxglove · MCAP
Any query engine

ClickHouse · DuckDB · Spark · Snowflake · BigQuery · Pandas · dbt

Data published via any protocol is immediately readable via all others. No ETL. No connectors. No secondary copies.

04 - Where Continuum fits

Built for physical AI teams with the toughest data.

Four segments, one data backbone. The pain shape is the same: large payloads, ordered history, replay, correction, and real-time plus historical access.

05 - How it compares

Different starting point.
Different primitives.

A growing set of companies share the view that physical AI and autonomous systems need durable data infrastructure. We see this as validation that the architectural direction is correct. The differences matter.

06 - Connect

Building physical AI or robotics systems at production scale?

If you’re stitching together Kafka, S3, Spark, MCAP files, and custom replay jobs to make robotics data usable at scale - or hitting Kafka’s payload ceiling on multimodal sensor data - we’d like to hear what you’re building.

Tell us about your robotics, physical AI, or autonomous systems project and we’ll show you what Continuum can do.